ON THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STATE IN TAKING THE PROCEEDING DECISIONS LEADING TO THE REHABILITATION OF A SUSPECT (ACCUSED) OR DEFENDANT

Authors

  • Aleksey Vladimirovich Krasilnikov Academy of Management of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs of Russia
  • Gurgen Zorikovich Gasparyan Academy of Management of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs of Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33184/vest-law-bsu-2024.24.12

Keywords:

criminal procedure, preliminary investigation, legality, rehabilitation

Abstract

The problems of ensuring the legality of procedural decisions leading to the rehabilitation of a suspect (accused), defendant continue to be in the focus of scientists-processualists for more than a hundred years. Unfortunately, many of them remain unresolved. The issues of the legal nature and limits of the state's responsibility for the harm caused during the criminal procedure, the possibility of bringing to legal responsibility officials who carry out pre-trial criminal procedure in case of adoption of rehabilitative decisions still remain relevant for scientific development. It is obvious that theoretical problems influence on the law enforcement practice, including on the operational and service activities of the preliminary investigation bodies of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs of Russia. In our opinion, the existing methodology and criteria for assessing the state of legality in the bodies of preliminary investigation of the system of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs of Russia need to be clarified.

Author Biographies

Aleksey Vladimirovich Krasilnikov , Academy of Management of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs of Russia

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Chair of Crime Investigation Management

Gurgen Zorikovich Gasparyan , Academy of Management of the Ministry of the Internal Affairs of Russia

Candidate of Sciences (Law), Senior Lecturer of the Chair of Crime Investigation Management

References

Головко Л.В. Государство и его уголовное судопроизводство : монография / Л.В. Головко. – Москва, 2022. – 464 с.

Розин Н.Н. Уголовное судопроизводство : пособие к лекциям / Н.Н. Розин. – Томск, 1914. – 569 с.

Челпанов Г.И. Учебник логики / Г.И. Челпанов. – Москва, 1915. – 107 с.

Алексеев Н.С. Очерк развития науки советского уголовного процесса / Н.С. Алексеев, В.Г. Даев, Л.Д. Кокорев. – Воронеж, 1980. – 251 с.

Мотовиловкер Я.О. Об ответственности за вред, причиненный гражданам неправильными служебными действиями следственных органов и суда / Я.О. Мотовиловкер //Правоведение. – 1973. – № 2. – С. 57–63.

Савицкий В.М. Об имущественной ответственности за вред, причиненный должностными лицами органов дознания, предварительного следствия, прокуратуры и суда / В.М. Савицкий, Е.А. Флейшиц // Советское государство и право. – 1966. – № 7.

Строгович М.С. Советский уголовно-процессуальный закон и проблемы его эффективности / М.С. Строгович, Л.Б. Алексеева, А.М. Ларин. – Москва, 1979. – 319 с.

Строгович М.С. Курс советского уголовного процесса : в 2 т. Т. 1 / М.С. Строгович. – Москва, 1968. – 470 с.

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

[1]
Красильников , А.В. and Гаспарян , Г.З. 2024. ON THE LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE STATE IN TAKING THE PROCEEDING DECISIONS LEADING TO THE REHABILITATION OF A SUSPECT (ACCUSED) OR DEFENDANT. Bulletin of the Institute of Law of the Bashkir State University. 7, 4(24) (Dec. 2024), 126–135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33184/vest-law-bsu-2024.24.12.

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL PROCEEDING